![]() Though there is clearly some merit in his approach, at times the grouping of images seems more inadvertent than intentional, and his claim that Laurence rivals James Joyce in artistic accomplishment appears exaggerated. Focusing particularly on her beginnings and endings, he reveals how these images act as motifs that lead to what he terms a “subliminal resonance” in the response of readersC. In this study, he coins the term “imagistic density” to describe the Laurence’s selective clustering of images as a way that reinforces thematic and symbolic associations important to plot and character development. “Imagistic Density in the Short Stories of Margaret Laurence.” Can-Con Currents 13 (2009): 158-87Aĭaniel Connor is one of the very few scholars to focus exclusively on Margaret Laurence’s short stories instead of her novels, the more common topic of inquiry for criticsB. Elaboration of strengths and limitations of work, as well as usefulness to projectĬonnor, Daniel.Identification of author and affiliation because author works in industry and source is an industry publication.His approach and methodology appear credible, but until his results are replicated by independent groups, one cannot dismiss bias possibly resulting from industry financing therefore, this article is of limited use in this research.D His conclusion is that the previously accepted assumption of an excessively high disease incidence in this age demographic is unwarranted and misleading. His findings uncover several computational errors in the traditional assessment methods, particularly the statistical pattern tools developed by Marsh and Mallow (2001). Nodrav, a biometricist working for an industry financed research institute called Pangalactic Biometrics, in Waterloo, OntarioB, applies a series of new algorithms to statistical analyses used for over a decade as standard measures for assessing the incidence of olfactory thrognosis among individuals aged 65 or overC. Statistical anomalies in standard olfactory-thrognosis incidence studies. See the University of Manchester’s Academic Phrasebank for examples of academic words and phrases you can use to add analysis to your annotated bibliography. Have you represented the sources fairly and with academic integrity?.Do you have accurate bibliographic information?.Explain how the text is useful or not useful for your work.Discuss the strengths and/or weaknesses of the text.Summarize the key arguments or, if this is a study, its goals and structure.Identify the author’s affiliation and the credibility of the source, if relevant.How is this source useful? Note its strengths and limitations as a source.Ĭonstruct each annotation by answering the following questions:.What is the author’s viewpoint or position?. ![]() What does the source say about the topic? Note the main arguments and supporting evidence.Is the source credible? Is it a peer-reviewed academic journal, an industry periodical, or another kind of source? What biases might the author hold as a result?.After carefully selecting the best sources for your topic, take accurate and specific notes by asking these important questions:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |